This setback of the United States against China could indicate that the world will move from the imitation of unipolarity that followed the Cold War, which had already been fading in the last two decades, towards a new bipolarity (some analysts speak of a "new Cold War"). cold"). The potential for conflict and rivalry between the world's two largest economies Whatsapp Mobile Number List should not be underestimated. A respected political analyst who has held important positions in the United States government, Graham Allison, coined the expression "Thucydides' trap," relating to the risk (or near certainty) of confrontation or war when an emerging power overtakes or threatens supremacy. of another hitherto dominant. This was what happened between Athens and Sparta in the Peloponnesian War, five centuries before our era.
But this is not necessarily so. First of all, from a military-strategic point of view, Russia cannot be ruled out, whose highly destructive modern weaponry potential has been continuously updated and improved; from hypersonic rockets to powerful nuclear-capable Whatsapp Mobile Number List torpedoes. Furthermore, Russia possesses a vast territory, stretching from the heart of Europe to the far arctic lands of the Far East, rich in natural resources, starting with oil and Whatsapp Mobile Number List in the world economy needs no comment. Not to mention the fact that, after the Yeltsian "hangover" period, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Moscow once again demonstrated great steadfastness on the international scene, illustrated, among other things, by its actions in Crimea and Syria . A) Yes,
Today, this balance tends to manifest itself through a "Eurasian" alliance between Moscow and Beijing, against a deliberately aggressive and highly unpredictable US government, as demonstrated in the conflicts in Syria and Afghanistan and, to some extent, in relation to South Korea. North. But the stability of this alliance is far from permanent. Nothing rules Whatsapp Mobile Number List out the possibility that, as in the past (who does not remember the Sino-Soviet conflict of the 1960s and 1970s?), clashes of interests may arise between the two great powers of the Eurasian continent, which, when the time comes , Washington can benefit. A very long common border can give rise to important cooperative actions, but it is also often a source of friction. This is not the most likely scenario at the moment,